Efficiency Determinants of Microfinance Institutions in India: Two Stage DEA Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.528Keywords:
Microfinance Institutions, Two stage DEA, Tobit Regression, Sustainability, Efficiency DeterminantsAbstract
Aim: In India, Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) emerged as major player in providing microfinance services and therefore such institutions need to be financially sustainable in order to achieve their double bottom-line objective. Besides, Indian MFIs cannot protect themselves from the curse of loan non-repayment. Therefore, this study aims to measure performance of the Indian MFIs and examine whether sustainability has any significant impact on the efficiency of the MFIs.
Design / Research methods: In order to gauge the performance of the Indian MFIs, non parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is adopted. Two models of DEA (BCC Model-input oriented and Undesirable Measure Model-output oriented) are applied used for better analysis. Further, to examine the factors influencing efficiency of the MFIs and particularly to answer whether Sustainability has any significant impact on efficiency, Tobit regression is applied in the study. Data of thirty-one Indian MFIs for seven years (2009-2015) are collected from MiX Market for the study.
Conclusions / findings: Result of the study shows that average technical efficiency of the MFIs is estimated to be 79 percent under BCC model and 98 percent under Undesirable Measure Model. Indian MFIs can attain production frontier if they can trim their bad output (proxied by Portfolio at Risk 30) to an extent of around 14 percent. Further, the study validates that sustainability (proxied by Operational Self Sufficiency) has positive impact on efficiency.
Originality / value of the article: Studies made so far on Indian MFIs have not addressed how the MFIs could become efficient by reducing their undesirable/bad output. Besides, no study so far has analysed the impact of sustainability on efficiency of the Indian MFIs. Therefore, this research tries to fill the existing research gap.
Implications of the research: The result of the study can be useful to the Indian Microfinance Industry in improving their performance. The result can further be used by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to frame yardstick for the clients of the MFIs in connection with borrowing loans from MFIs.
References
Abayie E.F.O., Amanor K., Frimpong M. (2011), The Measurement and determinants of economic efficiency of microfinance institutions in Ghana. A Stochastic frontier approach, „African Review of Economics and Finance”, vol. 2 no. 2, pp. 149-166.
Ahmed H. (2002), Financing microfinances. An Analytical study of Islamic microfinance institutions, „Islamic Economic Studies” vol. 9 no. 2, pp. 27-64.
Annim S.K. (2012), Microfinance efficiency trade-offs and complementarities between the objectives of microfinance institutions and their performance perspectives, „European Journal of Development Research”, vol. 24 no. 5, pp. 788-807.
ASSOCHAM INDIA (2016), Evolving landscape of microfinance institutions in India, http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-evolving-landscape-of-microfinance-institutions-in-india/$FILE/ey-evolving-landscape-of-microfinance-institutions-in-india.pdf [6.12.2017].
Balkenhol B. (2007), Efficiency and sustainability in microfinance, in: Microfinance and public policy. Outreach, performance and efficiency, ed. Balkenhol B., Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 3-23.
Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. (1984), Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, „Management Science”, vol. 30 no. 9, pp. 1078-1092.
Bogetoft P., Otto L. (2011), Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R, Springer Science + Business Media, London.
Brau J.C., Woller G.M. (2004), Microfinance. A Comprehensive review of the existing literature, „Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Venture”, vol. 9 no. 1, pp. 1-28.
Canhoto A., Dermine J. (2003), A note on banking efficiency in Portugal. New vs. old banks, „Journal of Banking & Finance”, vol. 27 no. 11, pp. 2087-2098.
Casu B., Molynuex P.A. (2003), A Comparative study of efficiency in European banking, „Applied Economics”, vol. 35, pp. 1865-1876.
Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, „European Journal of Operational Research”, vol. 2 no. 6, pp. 429-444.
Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (2010), Annual report, http://www.cgap.org/publications/cgap-annual-report-2010 [6.12.2017].
Cook W.D., Zhu J. (2005), Modeling performance measurement, Applications and implementation issues in DEA, Springer Science + Business Media, New York.
Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Tone K. (2000), Data envelopment analysis. A Comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Zhu J. (2004), Data envelopment analysis. History, models and interpretations, in: Handbook on data envelopment analysis, ed. Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Zhu J., Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht pp. 1-39.
Crabb P.R., Timothy K. (2006), A Test of portfolio risk in microfinance institutions, „Faith & Economics”, vol. 48, pp. 25-39.
Diop A., Hillenkamp I., Servet J.-M. (2007), Poverty versus inequality, in: Microfinance and public policy. Outreach, performance and efficiency, ed. Balkenhol B., Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 27-46.
Elyasiani E., Mehdian S.M. (1990), A nonparametric approach to measurement of efficiency and technological change. The case of large U.S. commercial banks, „Journal of Financial Services Research”, vol. 4, pp. 157-168.
Emrouznejad A., Anouze A.L. (2009), A note on the modeling the efficiency of top Arab banks, „Expert Systems with Applications”, vol. 36 no. 3, pp. 5741-5744.
Emrouznejad A., Anouze A.L. (2010), Data envelopment analysis with classification and regression tree – a case of banking efficiency, „Expert Systems”, vol. 27 no. 4, pp. 231-246.
Fare R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C.A.K., Pasurka C. (1989), Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable. A Non-parametric approach, „Review of Economics and Statistics”, vol. 71 no. 1, pp. 90-98.
Farrell M.J. (1957), The Measurement of productive efficiency, „Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General)”, vol. 120 no. 3, pp. 253-290.
Ferdousi F. (2013). Performance of microfinance institutions in Asia. DEA based efficiency analysis, International Conference on the Modern Development of the Humanities and Social Sciences, Atlantis Press, Paris, pp. 91-94.
Fluckiger Y., Vassiliev A. (2007), Efficiency in microfinance institutions. An Application of data envelopment analysis to MFIs in Peru, in: Microfinance and public policy. Outreach, performance and efficiency, ed. Balkenhol B., Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 89-110.
Gebremichael B.Z., Rani D.L. (2012), Total factor productivity change of Ethiopian Microfinance Institutions (MFIs). A Malmquist Productivity Index Approach (MPI), „European Journal of Business and Management” vol. 4 no. 3, pp. 105-114.
Gutiérrez-Nieto B., Serrano-Cinca C., Mar Molinero C. (2007), Microfinance institutions and efficiency, „Omega”, vol. 35 no. 2, pp. 131-142.
Gutiérrez-Nieto B., Serrano-Cinca C., Mar Molinero C. (2009), Social efficiency in microfinance institutions, „Journal of the Operational Research Society”, vol. 60 no. 1, pp. 104-119.
Haq M., Skully M., Pathan S. (2010), Efficiency of microfinance institutions. A Data envelopment analysis, „Asia-Pacific Financial Markets”, vol. 17 no. 1, pp. 63-97.
Hartarska V. (2004), Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the newly independent states (unpublished work).
Hartarska V. (2005), Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the newly independent states, „World Development” vol. 33, pp. 1627-1648.
Hassan M.K., Sanchez B. (2009), Efficiency analysis of microfinance institutions in developing countries, Network Financial Institute Working Paper No. 2009-WP-12, Indiana State University, http://indstate.edu/business/NFI/leadership/papers/2009-WP-12_Sanchez_Hassan.pdf [6.12.2017].
Isik I., Hassan M.K. (2003), Financial deregulation and total factor productivity change. An Empirical study of Turkish commercial banks, „Journal of Banking and Finance”, vol. 27, pp. 1455-1485.
Kipesha E.F. (2012), Efficiency of microfinance institutions in East Africa. A Data envelopment analysis, „European Journal of Business and Management”, vol. 4 no. 17, pp. 77-88.
Ledgerwood J. (1999), Microfinance handbook. An Institutional and financial perspective, The World Bank: Sustainable Banking with the Poor, Washington DC.
Liu W.B., Sharp J. (1999), DEA models via goal programming, in: Data Envelopment Analysis in the Public and Private Sector, ed. Westerman G., Deutscher Universtats-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
Malegam Committee Report (2011), Reserve Bank of India, www.rbi.org.in/SCRIPTS/PublicationReportDetails.aspx?UrlPage=&ID=608#L2 [6.12.2017].
Marakkath N. (2014), Sustainability of Indian microfinance institutions. A Mixed model approach, Springer, Dordrecht.
Martínez-González A. (2008), Technical efficiency of microfinance institutions. Evidence from Mexico. Thesis submitted to the Ohio State University.
Massod T., Ahmad I. (2010), Technical efficiency of microfinance institutions in India. A Stochastic frontier approach, http://ssrn.com/abstract=11689645 [6.12.2017].
McGuire P.B. et al. (1998), Getting the framework right. Policy and regulation for microfinance in Asia, http://www.bwtp.org/publications/pub/Chapter2.htm.
Mersland R., Strom R.O. (2009), Performance and governance in microfinance institutions, „Journal of Banking and Finance” vol. 33 no. 4, pp. 662-669.
Meyer R.L. (2002), Track record of financial institutions in assisting the poor in Asia, Working Paper, Asian Development Bank Institute (ADB), https://www.microfinancegateway.org/sites/default/files/mfg-en-paper-track-record-of-financial-institutions-in-assisting-the-poor-in-asia-dec-2002.pdf [6.12.2017].
Micrometer. (2017). Microfinance Institutions Network. Retrieved from http://mfinindia.org/latest-news/micrometer-issue-21-fy-16-17/
MiX Glossary. Retrived from www.themix.org/glossary#GlossaryTable on 5-2-2017.
Nanayakkara G. (2012), Measuring the performance of microfinancing institutions. A New approach, „South Asia Economic Journal”, vol. 13 no. 1, pp. 85-104.
Nawaz A. (2010), Efficiency and productivity of microfinance. Incorporating the role of subsidies, „CEB Working Paper” no. 10.
Nghiem H.S., Coelli T., Rao P. (2006), The Efficiency of microfinance in Vietnam. Evidence from NGO schemes in the North and the Central Region, „International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability”, vol. 25, pp. 71-78.
Obaidullah M. (2008), Introduction to Islamic microfinance, IBF Net (P) Limited, New Dehli.
Oikocredit (2005), Social performance report, www.oikocredit.coop/publications/social-and-environmental-performance-reports [6.12.2017].
Olivares Polanco F. (2005), Commercializing microfinance and developing outreach? Empirical evidence from Latin America, „Journal of Microfinance”, vol. 7 no. 2, pp. 38-40.
Pal D. (2010), Measuring technical efficiency of microfinance institutions in India, „Indian Journal of Agricultutral Economics”, vol. 65 no. 4, pp. 639-657.
Pissarides F., Nussmbaumer M., Gray C. (2004), Sustainability of microfinance banks. The Ultimate goal. Working Paper, „Law in Transition on-line”.
Quayes S. (2012), Depth of outreach and financial sustainability of microfinance institutions, „Applied Economics”, vol. 44 no. 26, pp. 3421-3433.
Rauf S.A., Mahamood T. (2009), Growth and performance of microfinance in Pakistan, „Pakistan Economic and Social Review”, vol. 47 no. 1, pp. 99-122.
Robinson M. (2001), The Microfinance revolution. Sustainable finance for the poor. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank, Washington DC, http://people.virginia.edu/~sj8n/research/microfinJELreview.pdf [6.12.2017].
Rosenberg R. (2009), Measuring results of microfinance institutions. Minimum Indicators That Donors
and Investors Should Track. Technical guide, The World Bank, Washington DC, https://www.cgap.org/sites/default/files/CGAP-Technical-Guide-Measuring-Results-of-Microfinance-Institutions-Minimum-Indicators-That-Donors-and-Investors-Should-Track-Jul-2009.pdf [6.12.2017].
Shylendra H.S. (2006), Microfinance institutions in Andhra Pradesh. Crisis and diagnosis, „Economic and Political Weekly”, vol. 41 no. 20.
Singh S., Goyal S.K., Sharma S.K. (2013), Technical efficiency and its determinants in microfinance institutions in India. A Firm level analysis, „Journal of Innovation Economics”, vol. 1 no. 11, pp. 15-31.
Soteriou A.C., Zenios S.A. (1997), Efficiency, profitability and quality in the provision of financial services, Working Paper no 97-13, Department of Public and Business Administration University of Cyprus, Nicosia.
Sriram M.S. (2010), Commercialisation of microfinance in India. A Discussion of the emperor’s apparel, „Economic and Political Weekly”, no. 24, pp. 65-74.
Tahir I.M., Tahrim S.N.C. (2013), Efficiency analysis of microfinance institutions in ASEAN. A DEA approach, „Business Management Dynamics”, vol. 3 no. 4, pp. 13-23.
Thanassoulis E. (2001), Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
Thanassoulis E., Boussofiane A., Dyson R.G. (1996), A Comparison of data envelopment analysis and ratio analysis as tool for performance assessment, „Omega”, vol. 24, pp. 229-244.
Tulchin D. (2003), Microfinance’s double bottom line, MicroCapital Institute, Boston, www.micro capital.org [6.12.2017].
Widiarto. I., Emrouznejad. A. (2015), Social and financial efficiency of Islamic microfinance instiitutions. A Data envelopment analysis application, „Socio-Economic Planning Science”, vol. 50, pp. 1-17.
Wijesiri M., Vigano L., Meoli M. (2015), Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka. A Two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach, „Economic Modelling”, vol. 47, pp. 74-83.
Worthington A.C. (1998), The Determinants of non-bank financial institution efficiency. A Stochastic cost frontier approach, „Applied Financial Economics”, vol. 8 no. 3, pp. 279-289.
Yaron J. (1994), Successful rural financial institutions, „The World Bank Research Observer”, vol. 9 no. 1, pp. 49-70.
Zerai B., Rani L. (2011), Is there a trade-off between outreach and sustainability of microfinance institutions? Evidence from Indian Microfinance Institutions, „Research Journal of Finance and Accounting”, vol. 2 no. 11, pp. 2222-2847.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.
