Employee’s personal determinants of fitting the job characteristics
AbstractAim: Over the last twenty years there have been numerous studies showing significant relationships between personality dimensions and predisposition to doing a job of a specific character. The aim of this research is to examine the relationships between personality, job characteristics and perceived job satisfaction with a view to demonstrate the rationale behind the application of personality tests as the tool for predicting the employee’s fitting the job specification in the recruitment process.
Design / Research methods: In order to verify the selected relationships, a quantitative study on a group of Polish workers (N = 302) was carried out. It correlated five personality dimensions (tested by the NEO-FFI questionnaire) with the level of employee’s satisfaction and the work characteristics (questionnaires made by the author were used).The satisfaction level was determined based on employees’ job assessment and professional career development, while the character of the job was examined according to seven scales: individual vs. team work, complexity of tasks, application of new technologies, procedures, customer contact, influence on customer’s emotions, dependence on supervisor.
Conclusions / findings: The results of the analyses showed that each personality dimension was significantly different for respondents satisfied with their performance of work of a particular nature. This can confirm the use of personality tests in the recruitment process; however, some factors need to be taken into account, including, among others, organizational environment or specific job demands.
Originality / value of the article: The article is an attempt to link comprehensively different studies focusing on the association between personality and the type of work performed, with this objective being expanded by adding a moderate variable - job satisfaction, which allows one to determine the extent to which the type of work fits a particular dimension of personality.
Implications of the research: The implicational value pertains to recruitment and selection processes, justifying the validity of the personality test application in recruitment processes. Limitations of the research: In the future, it would be useful to enlarge the group examined in order to be able to generalize the results and add other moderate variables, such as, for example, organizational demands shaping the character of work.
Albrecht S.L., Bakker A.B., Gruman J.A., Macey W.H., Saks A.M. (2015), Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage, Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, Vol. 2 , nr 1, s. 7 – 35.
Barrick M.R., Mount M.K. (1991), The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis, Personnel Psychology, vol 44, s.1-26.
Barrick M.R., Mount M.K., Judge T.A. (2001), Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What do We Know and Where Do We Go Next?, International Journal of selection and assessment, vol 9 , nr 1-2, s.9-30
Berg P.T., Feij J.A. (2003), Complex Relationships Among Personality Traits, Job Characteristics, and Work Behaviors, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, vol. 11 , nr 4, s. 326-339.
Blickle G., Meurs J.A., Wihler A., Ewen C., Plies A.,Günther S. (2013), The interactive effects of conscientiousness, openness to experience, and political skill on job performance in complex jobs: The importance of context, Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol 34 , nr 8, s.1145-1164. DOI: 10.1002/job.1843
Brzozowski P., Drwal R.Ł. (1995), Kwestionariusz Osobowości Eysencka. Polska adaptacja EPQ-R, Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego, Warszawa
Chirkowska-Smolak T., Grobelny J. (2014), Wykorzystanie metod doboru personelu oraz przekonania profesjonalistów na temat ich trafności prognostycznej, Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, 96, s. 125-142.
Chmiel N. (2002), Psychologia pracy i organizacji, Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Costa P.T., McCrae R.R, Dye D.A. (1991), Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness:A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, nr 12, s.887-898.
Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. (1995), Domains and Facets: Hierarchical Personality Assessment Using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory, Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 64 , nr 1,s. 21-50.
Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. (2004), A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory, Personality and Individual Differences vol. 36 , s. 587–596.
Dunn W.S., Mount M.K., Barrick M.R. , Ones D.S. (1995), Relative importance of personality and general mentalability in managers’ judgements of applicant qualifications,Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, s. 500-509.
Hogan R., Hogan J., Roberts B.W. (1996), Personality Measurement and Employment Decisions: Questions and Answers, American Psychologist, 51, s. 469-477.
Judge T.A., Kammeyer-Mueller J.D. (2007), Personality and Career Success, w: Handbook of Career Studies , red. M. Peiperl, H. Gunz , Thousand Oaks, Sage, s. 59-78.
Locke E.A. (1976), The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction, w: Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, red. M.D. Dunnette, Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Company.
McCrae R.R., John O.P. (1992), An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications, Journal of Personality, vol. 60 , nr 2, s.175-215.
Neal A., Koy A., Yeo G. , Xiao T. (2012), Predicting the form and direction of work role performance from the Big 5 model of personality traits. Journal of Organizational Behavior 33, s. 175–192. DOI: 10.1002/job.742
Ones D. S., Viswesvaran C., Schmidt F. L. (1993), Comprehensive metaanalysis of integrity test validation: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, s. 679-703.
Pervin, L.A. (2002), Psychologia osobowości. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk.
Spector P.E.(1997), Job Satisfaction: Application, Assessment, Cause, and Consequences,
Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Tett R.P., Jackson D.N. , Rothstein M. (1991), Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review, Personnel Psychology, 44, s. 703-742.
Tett R.P., Burnett D.D. (2003), A Personality Trait-Based Interactionist Model of Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, nr 3, s. 500-517.
Watson D., Clark L.A. (1997), Extraversion and its positive emotional core. W:
Handbook of personality psychology, red. Hogan R., Johnson J., Briggs S., San
Diego, Academic Press, s. 767-793.
Zawadzki B., Strelau J., Szczepaniak P., Śliwińska M. (2010), Inwentarz Osobowości Paula T. Costy Jr i Roberta R.McCrae. Adaptacja polska, Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego, Warszawa.
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB University in Wrocław, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB University in Wrocław, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB University in Wrocław.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB University in Wrocław.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB University in Wrocław.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.