Economic models to evaluate energy costs: Are externalities and energy accounting the answer?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.920Keywords:
Embodied energy, energy accounting, externalities, renewable energyAbstract
Aim: In the context of climate change this paper explores the value of models for evaluating energy costs by considering energy accounting and externalities instead of capitalistic economics.
Research methods: We test the hypothesis that the conventional economic model of the energy market can lead to inappropriate choices, and that those choices may be environmentally damaging. We examine energy accounting (energy return on energy investment), embodied energy and the incorporation of external costs as more valuable economic models.
Findings: This paper reviews existing economic tools and examines modifications, which, when applied to energy provision or efficiency and conservation of energy applications, may give more accurate information about investment, return and environmental damage. Energy accounting of schemes should be a preliminary requirement for all proposed energy schemes. Externalities are less readily applied, but as the costs associated with renewable energy are becoming competitive in conventional economic terms, they are less valuable than energy accounting.
Value of the paper: The paper concludes that a preliminary assessment of a proposed energy scheme should be undertaken using energy accounting and external costs to determine the true energy value. These models could be used to select the best environmental option. Indeed “energy uneconomic” schemes, which cost more energy than they deliver, should be abandoned in order to avoid unnecessary environmental damage. After this process, legislation and fiscal measures such as taxes and incentives could be applied to satisfy social and political imperatives. Examples of energy accounting in insulation and consideration of external costs in a proposed strategy to replace fossil-fuelled electrical generation in Indonesia are included in the paper.
Limitations: We have not considered the serious question of finite fossil fuel resources and feel that this would be a profitable line of research.
References
BP (2021), Statistical review of world energy, BP PLC, https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2021-full-report.pdf [29.08.2021].
Bull J. (2021), Embodied carbon of insulation, Greenspec, https://www.greenspec.co.uk/building-design/embodied-carbon-of-insulation/ [29.08.2021].
Brockway P.E., Owen A., Brand-Correa L.I., Hardt L. (2019), Estimation of global final-stage energy-return-on-investment for fossil fuels with comparison to renewable energy sources, “Nature Energy”, vol. 4, pp. 612-621.
Bruntland Commission (1987), Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future, UN Oxford University Press, New York.
Carney M. (2020), Reith lectures BBC, https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000py8t [29.08.2021].
COP21 (2015), Binding international agreement in Paris 2015, https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement [29.08.2021].
Crease R.P. (2021), A million years into the future: why you need a dose of very deep thinking, “Physics World”, vol. 34 no. 2, https://physicsworld.com/a/a-million-years-into-the-future-why-you-need-a-dose-of-very-deep-thinking/ [29.08.2021].
Dams T., van Schaik L., Stoetman A. (2020), Presence before power China’s Arctic strategy in Iceland and Greenland, Netherland Institute of International Relations, Clingendael Report June 2020.
Duckers L., Hasanah U. (2020), Transition to low carbon electrical generation for Indonesia, “Journal of Sustainability Research”, vol. 2 no. 3, e20002.
EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2021), Climate change indicators: greenhouse gases, https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/greenhouse-gases [29.08.2021].
ExternE (2006), Externalities of energy, European Commission, http://www.externe.info/externe_2006/brussels/methup05a.pdf [29.08.2021].
Ferroni F., Hopkirk R. (2016), Energy Return on Energy Invested (ERoEI) for photovoltaic solar systems in regions of moderate insolation, “Energy Policy”, vol. 94, pp. 336-344.
Greim P., Solomon A.A., Breyer C. (2020), Assessment of lithium criticality in the global energy transition and addressing policy gaps in transportation, “Nature Communications”, vol. 11, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-18402-y [29.08.2021].
Guardian (2021), Covid: ‘greed’ and capitalism behind vaccine success, Johnson tells MPs, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/mar/23/greed-and-capitalism-behind-jab-success-boris-johnson-tells-mps [29.08.2021].
Hall C., Lavine M., Sloane J. (1979), Efficiency of energy delivery systems. Part 1: An economic and energy analysis, “Environmental Management”, vol. 3 no. 6, pp. 493-504.
Hall C.A.S., Lambert J.G., Balogh S.B. (2014), EROI of different fuels and the implications for society, “Energy Policy”, vol. 64, pp. 141-152.
IPCC (2020) IPCC Special report: Global Warming of 1.5°C. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_Low_Res.pdf [29.08.2021].
IPCC (2021), Climate change 2021. The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Masson-Delmotte V., Zhai P., Pirani A., Connors S.L., Péan C., Berger S., Caud N., Chen Y., Goldfarb L., Gomis M.I., Huang M., Leitzell K., Lonnoy E., Matthews J.B.R., Maycock T.K., Waterfield T., Yelekçi O., Yu R., Zhou B. (eds.), Cambridge University Press [in press].
Jowitt S.M., Mudd G.M., Thompson J.F.H. (2020), Future availability of non-renewable metal resources and the influence of environmental, social, and governance conflicts on metal production, “Communications Earth & Environment”, vol. 1, https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-020-0011-0 [29.08.2021].
Lazard (2018), Lazard levelized cost of energy analysis – version 12, https://www.lazard.com/media/450784/lazards-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-120-vfinal.pdf [29.08.2021].
Marshall T. (2015), Prisoners of geography, Elliott and Thompson, London.
Monbiot G. (2016), How did we get into this mess?, Verso Books, New York.
Murphy D., Hall C., Dale M., Cleveland C. (2011), Order from chaos. A preliminary protocol for determining the EROI of fuels, “Sustainability”, vol. 3 no. 10, pp. 1888-1907.
Olson C., Lenzmann F. (2016), The social and economic consequences of the fossil fuel supply chain,
“MRS Energy & Sustainability: A Review Journal”, vol. 3, pp. 1-32.
Raugei M., Sgouridis S., Murphy D., Fthenakis V., Frischknecht R., Breyer C., Bardi U., Barnhart C., Buckley A., Carbajales-Dale M., Csala D., de Wild-Scholten M., Heath G., Jæger-Waldau A., Jones C., Keller A., Leccisi E., Mancarella P., Pearsall N., Siegel A., Sinke W., Stolz P. (2017), Energy Return on Energy Invested (ERoEI) for photovoltaic solar systems in regions of moderate insolation. A comprehensive response, “Energy Policy”, vol. 102, pp. 377-384.
Schumacher E.F. (1973), Small is beautiful, Abacus, London.
Stern N. (2007), The economics of climate change. The Stern review, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Stern N. (2015), Why are we waiting?, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
Tariq J. (2019), Incorporating LCA in solar PV design and planning for sustainability Optimization, Masters thesis, University of Flensburg, http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30139.77600 [29.08.2021].
World Nuclear Association (2017), Externalities of electricity generation, https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/energy-return-on-investment.aspx [29.08.2021].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.
