Correcting inequality of personal incomes before income taxes and transfers: theoretical underpinnings and competition policy options
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.919Keywords:
Market imperfections, superstar economy, Gini coefficient, competition policyAbstract
Aim: The purpose of this paper is to bring together theory and policy of (personal) income distribution on the one hand and competition policy on the other hand.
Design / research: The methods used in this paper cover a brief model set-up, followed by a numerical model-calibration. Thereafter, we present a model simulation and proceed to a Gini decomposition. Herewith, we are able to demonstrate how market imperfections translate into a higher concentration of personal incomes.
Conclusions / findings: Our major finding is that only a rigorous competition policy is qualified to not only correct for market imperfections, but also to fight a greater inequality of personal incomes ex-ante.
Originality / value of the article: This contribution provides – to our knowledge for the first time – a simultaneous explanation for stagnating, if not falling real wages and a deteriorating development of inequality of personal incomes, as measured by the Gini coefficient ex-ante. The US economy is a case study for this double observation, but many more developed economies may follow in the foreseeable future.
Limitations of the research: The implication of the research is that long before government intervenes income distribution via taxes and transfers, competition policy should correct for market imperfections and thereby reduce the inequality of personal incomes. Unfortunately, to this point, we observe a lack of meaningful macroeconomic indicators for market imperfections and hence the possibility to conduct broad econometric studies in this area of investigation.
References
Apergis N. et al. (2018), Convergence in income inequality. Further evidence from the club clustering methodology across states in the U.S., “International Advances in Economic Research”, vol. 24 no. 2, pp. 147-161.
Autor D. et al. (2020), The fall of the labour share and the rise of superstar firms, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 135 no. 2, pp. 645-709.
Bao Y., Dhongde S. (2009), Testing convergence in income distribution, “Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics”, vol. 71 no. 2, pp. 295-302.
Barro R.J., Sala-i-Martin J. (1999), Economic growth, The MIT Press, Cambridge, M.A.
Campano F., Salvatore D. (2006), Income distribution, Oxford Economic Press, Oxford.
Card D., Krueger A.B. (1997), Myth and measurement. The new economics of the minimum wage, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Castells M. (1996), The information age: economy, society and culture, Blackwell, Chichester, Wiley, Cambridge, M.A.
Chown J. et al. (2019), The opportunities and limitations of monopsony power in healthcare: evidence from the United States and Canada, NBER Working Paper No. 26122, Cambridge, M.A.
Colciago A., Mechelli R. (2020), Competition and inequality, DNB Working Paper No. 689, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department, Den Haag.
Congressional Research (2020), Real Wage trends, 1979-2019. CRS Report, Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress. https://crsreports.congress.gov (19.01.2021)
Costa M. (2019), The evolution of gender income inequality by means of the Gini index decomposition, Working Paper DS No. 1130, Universita di Bologna.
Cowell F.A., Mehta F. (1982), The estimation and interpolation of inequality measures, “The Review of Economic Studies”, vol. 49, pp. 273-290.
Desilver D. (2018), For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades, PEW Research Center, August 7, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/07/for-most-us-workers-real-wages-have-barely-budged-for-decades/ [08.06.2021].
Doran J., Jordan D. (2016), Decomposing US regional income inequality from 1969 to 2009, “Applied Economics Letters”, vol. 23 no. 10-12, pp. 781-784.
Doran J., Jordan D. (2020), The wolf at the door. The menace of economic insecurity and how to fight it, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, M.A.
Frank M.W. (2021), U.S. state-level income inequality data, https://www.shsu.edu/eco¬_mwf/inequality.html [17.01.2021].
Goolsbee A., Syverson C. (2019), Monopsony power in higher education: a tale of two tracks, NBER Working Paper No. 26070, Cambridge, M.A.
Guo Y., Sell F.L. (2020), Equilibrium and convergence in personal income distribution? How European countries performed during a phase of huge economic turbulence (2004-2017), Working Papers in Economics, vol. 31, no. 1, Neubiberg.
Guo Y., Sell F.L. (2021), Equilibrium and convergence in income distribution. The case of 28 European countries in the recent, turbulent past (1995-2019), “Central European Economic Journal”, vol. 8, no. 55, forthcoming.
Hefti A., Teichgräber J. (2021), Inequality in models with a competition for market shares, Universität Zürich, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Working Paper No. 375, Zurich.
Helble M. et al. (2018), The impact of increased import competition from the People’s Republic of China on income inequality and household welfare in Vietnam, Asian Development Bank Institute. Working Paper No. 864, Tokyo.
Külp B. (1975), Wohlfahrts-Ökonomik I: Die Wohlfahrtskriterien, J.C.B. Mohr, Werner-Verlag, Tübingen.
Lin P.-C., Huang H.-C. (2012), Convergence in income inequality? Evidence from panel unit root tests with structural breaks, “Empirical Economics”, vol. 43, pp. 153-174.
Makofske M. (2018), Are you hiring Johnny Football or Johnny Doe? Uncertain labour quality and measurement of monopsony in college football, “Applied Economics”, vol. 50 no 22, pp. 2415-2430.
McKinsey & Company (2019), A new look at the declining labour share of income in the United States. Discussion Paper, May 22, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/ [15.01.2021].
Moore M., Tambini D. (2018), Digital dominance. The power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Motta M. (2009), Competition policy: theory and practice, 9th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Öllinger M., Sell F.L. (2017), What determines unions’ density? A political economy model of the labour market with empirical evidence in the context of European countries, “Review of Economics and Finance”, vol. 10 no. 4, pp. 18-32.
Oezmucur S., Silber J. (2008), Internal migration, household size and income inequality in Turkey, in: Advances on income inequality and concentration measures, Betti G., Lemmi A. (eds.), Routledge, London, New York, pp. 324-339.
Ostermair C., Sell F.L. (2020), Are minimum wages an appropriate lever to restore the wage share?, unpublished work, Neubiberg.
Piketty T., Saez E. (2003), Income inequality in the US, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 118, pp. 1-39.
Rey S.J. (2018), Bells in space. The spatial dynamics of US interpersonal and interregional income inequality, “International Regional Science Review”, vol. 41 no. 2, pp. 152-182.
Richter F. (2019), Average hourly wages climb to unprecedented high, June 13, https://www.statista.com/ [25.05.2021].
Sell F.L. (2015), The new economics of income distribution. introducing equilibrium concepts into a contested field, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
Sell F.L., Kermer S. (2017), Aufgaben und Lösungen in der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Arbeitsbuch zu Engelkamp, 4th ed., Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Sell F.L., Kermer S. (2021), Aufgaben und Lösungen in der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Arbeitsbuch zu Engelkamp, 5th ed. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, forthcoming.
Sell F.L., Ruf E.K. (2016), Monopsony in the labour market, minimum wages and the time horizon: some unresolved issues, “Atlantic Economic Journal”, vol. 44 no. 1, pp. 75-90.
Shira J. (2003), Statistische Methoden der VWL und BWL. Theorie und Praxis, Pearson Studium, München, Boston, San Francisco.
Shorrocks A.F. (1982), Inequality decomposition by factor components, “Econometrica”, vol. 50 no. 1, pp. 193-211.
Stricker F. (2020), American unemployment. Past, present, and future, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.
