The seductive logic of subtractive sustainability: reflections on sustainable socio-economic development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.305Keywords:
Diversity, Institutions, Organisational Culture, Sustainable DevelopmentAbstract
Aim: To discuss the drivers and impediments sustainability of social systems.
Design / Research methods: Analysis of and reflections on the discussions on campus antifragility during the 4th international conference on efficiency, sustainable business and sustainable economic development, hosted by WSB Wroclaw on May 13th 2016.
Conclusions / findings: (1) Lack of sustainability results from organisational culture or dominant logic rather than from primary activities; (2) Disequilibrium in organisational culture reflects a lack of congruence between formal and informal institutions; (3) Conflict between informal and formal institutions is a driver of change, unless the formal institutions are enforced as a core cultural value; (4) Sustainability and sustainable development in a turbulent environment should aim for organisational and cultural diversity.
Originality / value of the article: This discussion note shows that a good metaphor can generate new insights. Viewed in terms of organisational viability and antifragility it is not what is done, but how it is done that determines the sustainability of an organisation. This implies that the ends never justify the means. The discussion note shows that sustainable development requires a critical reflection on the formal institutions and governance systems that determine these means. Likewise sustainable marketing requires a critical reflection on market institutions.
References
Abramson, L.Y., Seligman, M.E., & Teasdale, J.D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. Journal of abnormal psychology, 87(1), 49.
Adler, P.S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61-89.
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). A stupidity-based theory of organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1194-1220.
Antonio, R.J. (1979). The contradiction of domination and production in bureaucracy: The contribution of organizational efficiency to the decline of the Roman Empire. American Sociological Review, 44(6), 895-912.
Balmer, J.M., & Wilson, A.M. (2001). Understanding organisational culture and the implications for corporate marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 353-367.
Banks, J.A. (2008). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational researcher, 37(3), 129-139.
Berry, B. (2004). Organizational culture: A framework and strategies for facilitating employee whistleblowing. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 16(1), 1-11.
Box, G.E.P. (1976). Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791-799.
Briley, D.A., & Wyer Jr, R.S. (2002). The Effect of Group Membership Salience on the Avoidance of Negative Outcomes: Implications for Social and Consumer Decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 400-415.
Cameron, K.S., & Quinn, R.E. (2005). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework: John Wiley & Sons.
Coase, R.H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1), 1-44.
Cohan, J.A. (2002). "I didn't know" and "I was only doing my job": Has corporate governance careened out of control? A case study of Enron's information myopia. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(3), 275-299.
Dauber, D., Fink, G., & Yolles, M. (2012). A configuration model of organizational culture. SAGE Open, 2(1), 1-16.
Deshpande, R., Farley, J.U., & Webster Jr, F.E. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: a quadrad analysis. The journal of Marketing, 23-37.
Eckerman, I. (2005a). The Bhopal gas leak: Analyses of causes and consequences by three different models. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 18(4), 213-217.
Eckerman, I. (2005b). The Bhopal saga: causes and consequences of the world's largest industrial disaster. Hyderabad: Universities press.
Fisher, R.A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Geddes, L. (2012). Antifragil: how to make an unstable world strong. interview with Nassim Nicholas Taleb: New Scientist, 14 November 2012.
Giroux, H.A. (2011, Tuesday, 18 January 2011). Beyond the Swindle of the Corporate University: Higher Education in the Service of Democracy. Truthout.
Grönroos, C. (1984). A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36-44.
Harris, H. (2008). Promoting ethical reflection in the teaching of business ethics. Business ethics: A European review, 17(4), 379-390.
Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1988). Incomplete contracts and renegotiation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 755-785.
Hatch, M.J. (1993). The dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 657-693.
Horton, J. (1964). The dehumanization of anomie and alienation: a problem in the ideology of sociology. The British Journal of Sociology, 15(4), 283-300.
Jickling, B. (1992). Viewpoint: Why I don't want my children to be educated for sustainable development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 23(4), 5-8.
Kapp, K.W. (1971). The social costs of private enterprise, 2nd ed. New York: Schocken books.
Kilbourne, W.E., Beckmann, S.C., & Thelen, E. (2002). The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: A multinational examination. Journal of Business Research, 55(3), 193-204.
Kilbourne, W.E., Dorsch, M.J., McDonagh, P., Urien, B., Prothero, A., Grünhagen, M., et al. (2009). The institutional foundations of materialism in western societies. Journal of Macromarketing, 29(3), 259-278.
Kovalenko, T., & Sornette, D. (2013). Dynamical diagnosis and solutions for resilient natural and social systems. Planet@Risk, 1(1), 7-33.
Kropotkin, P. (1927). Anarchism: A collection of revolutionary writings. North Chelmsford (Mass): Courier Corporation.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1950). Introduction à l'oeuvre de Marcel Mauss In: Marcel Mauss (1902 - 1938), Sociologie et anthropologie. Paris: PUF.
McMaster, K.I. (2003). Not just another day on the job - Implementation of sustainable development in the minerals industry. Exploration and Mining Geology, 12(1-4), 1-4.
Mietelski, J.W., Kierepko, R., Brudecki, K., Janowski, P., Kleszcz, K., & Tomankiewicz, E. (2014). Long-range transport of gaseous 131I and other radionuclides from Fukushima accident to Southern Poland. Atmospheric Environment, 91, 137-145.
Milburn, K., & Harvie, D. (2016). On the uses of fairy dust: Contagion, sorcery and the crafting of other worlds. Culture and Organization, 1-17.
Muja, N., Appelbaum, S.H., Walker, T., Ramadan, S., & Sodeyi, T. (2014). Sustainability and organizational transformation: Putting the cart before the horse? (part two). Industrial and Commercial Training, 46(6), 307-314.
Nietzsche, F. (1889). Götzen-Dämmerung oder wie man mit dem Hammer philosophirt. Leipzig: Verlag von C.G.Neuman.
Osband, K. (2013). Turbulence and Evolutionary Fitness. Wilmott, 2013(64), 8-11.
Palazzo, G., Krings, F., & Hoffrage, U. (2012). Ethical Blindness. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 323-338.
Piedelievre, J.P., Musson-Genon, L., & Bompay, F. (1990). MEDIA - an Eulerian model of atmospheric dispersion: first validation on the Chernobyl release. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 29(12), 1205-1220.
Platje, J. (2008). An institutional capital approach to sustainable development. Management of Environmental Quality, 19(2), 222-233.
Platje, J. (2011). Institutional capital - creating capacity and capabilities for sustainable development (Vol. 463). Opole: Uniwersytet Opolski.
Polanyi, K. (1944). The great ransformation: the political and economics origings of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Popper, K. (1945). The open society and its enemies: part 1 The age of Plato. London: Routledge.
Porter, M.E. (1998). The competitive advantage of nations. New York [etc.]: The Free Press.
Pratchett, T. (1995). Maskerade. Londn: Victor Gollancz Ltd.
Schein, E.H. (2006). Organizational culture and leadership. San Fransisco (CA): John Wiley & Sons.
Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American sociological review, 24(6), 783-791.
Serpa, S. (2016). An Overview of the concept of organisational culture. International Business Management, 10(1), 51-61.
Shearman, R. (1990). The meaning and ethics of sustainability. Environmental Management, 14(1), 1-8.
Sørensen, J.B. (2002). The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Administrative science quarterly, 47(1), 70-91.
Sugita, M., & Takahashi, T. (2015). Influence of corporate culture on environmental management performance: An empirical study of japanese firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(3), 182-192.
Sutton, R.I., & Louis, M.R. (1987). How selecting and socializing newcomers influences insiders. Human Resource Management, 26(3), 347-361.
Taleb, N.N. (2012a). Antifragile. Things that gain from disorder. London: Penguin Books.
Taleb, N.N. (2012b). Antifragile: how to live in a world we don't understand (Vol. 3): Allen Lane London.
Tönnies, F. (1887). Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Leipzig: Fues's Verlag.
Van Dam, Y.K., & Apeldoorn, P.A.C. (1996). Sustainable marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 16(2), 45-56.
Von Mises, L. (1949). Human action: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Von Mises, L. (2012). The ultimate foundation of economic science: Liberty Fund.
Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.
