Calling for ‘The New Cultural Normal’
Learning from intra-company biculturalism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.963Keywords:
Cultural Diversity, Biculturalism, Intra-national, Cross-cultural Management, Work Place Integration, OrganizationAbstract
Aim: This research aims to understand the value of individuals having several inherent cultures and explore their specific needs and skills to improve managing cultural challenges in the work environment. The emerging conceptual framework of reaching ‘The New Cultural Normal’ demonstrates opportunities for dealing with cross-cultural situations not only internationally but especially intra-national.
Design / Research methods: Based on insights and narratives of bicultural employees collected through 18 interviews, several vital categories emerged followed by the attribution of each to a corporate setting and considering which has the most substantial influence on that category. As biculturalism is an extreme form of coping with cultural diversity, the interviewees represent vital experts in coping with culturally diverse challenges.
Conclusion / Findings: The emerging concept of reaching ‘The New Cultural Normal’ describes the process of attaining the status of full integration of biculturalism among organizations. It will help each corporate setting level, defined as bicultural employees, colleagues, supervisors, and the company, to enhance their awareness of dealing with cross-cultural situations.
Originality / value of the article: This study provides a beneficial starting tool for shaping the future workplace where more inclusion and contentment will lead to qualitative improved team outcomes thus increasing corporate performance and can even result in long-term societal changes.
References
Adler N. (1991), International dimensions of organizational behavior, PWS-Kent Publishing Company, Boston.
Barker G.G. (2017), Acculturation and bicultural integration in organizations. Conditions, contexts, and challenges, “International Journal of Cross Cultural Management”, vol. 17 no. 3, pp. 281–304.
Benet-Martínez V., Lee F., Leu J. (2006), Biculturalism and cognitive complexity. Expertise in cultural representations, “Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology”, vol. 37 no. 4, pp. 386–407.
Bernard H.R. (1988), Research methods in cultural anthropology, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Berry J. (1990), Psychology of acculturation. Understanding individuals moving between cultures, in: Applied cross-cultural psychology, Brislin R.W. (ed.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 232–253.
Bickman L., Rog D.J. (2008), The Sage handbook of applied social research methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Bowen G.A. (2006), Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts, “International Journal of Qualitative Methods”, vol. 5 no. 3, pp. 12–23.
Brannen M.Y., Thomas D.C. (2010), Bicultural individuals in organizations. Implications and opportunity, Sage Publications, London.
Burnard P., Gill P., Stewart K., Treasure E., Chadwick B. (2008), Analysing and presenting qualitative data, “British Dental Journal”, vol. 204 no. 8, pp. 429–432.
Charmaz K. (1996), The search for meanings – grounded theory, in: Rethinking methods in psychology, Smith J.A., Harré R., Van Langenhove L. (eds.), Sage Publications, London, pp. 27–49.
Coleman D. (2009), Migration and its consequences in 21st century Europe, “Vienna Yearbook of Population Research”, vol. 7, pp. 1–18.
Costa A. (2020), The Bilingual brain and what it tells us about the science of language, Penguin UK, London.
Cox T. (1994), Cultural diversity in organizations. Theory, research and practice, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco.
Cox T.H., Blake S. (1991), Managing cultural diversity. Implications for organizational competitiveness, “Academy of Management Perspectives”, vol. 5 no. 3, pp. 45–56.
Dietz G., Gillespie N., Chao G.T. (2010), Unravelling the complexities of trust and culture, in: Organizational trust. A cultural perspective, Saunders M.N.K., Skinner D., Dietz G., Gillespie N., Lewicki R.J. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 3–41.
Earley C.P., Mosakowski E. (2000), Creating hybrid team cultures. An empirical test of transnational team functioning, “Academy of Management Journal”, vol. 43 no. 1, pp. 26–49.
Eisenhardt K.M., Graebner M.E. (2007), Theory building from cases. Opportunities and challenges, “Academy of Management Journal”, vol. 50 no. 1, pp. 25–32.
Eytan A. (2004), Globalisation and biculturalism, “The British Journal of Psychiatry”, vol. 184 no. 4, pp. 362–363.
Fink G., Holden N., Kayes D.C., Kayes A.B., Yamazaki Y. (2005), Essential competencies for cross‐cultural knowledge absorption, “Journal of Managerial Psychology”, vol. 20 no. 7, pp. 578–589.
Fitzsimmons S.R. (2013), Multicultural employees. A framework for understanding how they contribute to organizations, “Academy of Management Review”, vol. 38 no. 4, pp. 525–549.
Garwin D.A. (1993), Building a learning organization, “Harvard Business Review”, vol. 71 no. 4, pp. 73–91.
Glaser B.G. (1992), Emergence vs forcing. Basics of grounded theory analysis, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. (1967), The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research, Aldine, Chicago.
Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. (2017), Discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research, Routledge, New York.
Goulding C. (2002), Grounded theory. A practical guide for management, business and market researchers, Sage Publications, London.
Grosse C.U. (2004), The competitive advantage of foreign languages and cultural knowledge, “The Modern Language Journal”, vol. 88 no. 3, pp. 351–373.
Hoever I.J., Van Knippenberg D., Van Ginkel W.P., Barkema H.G. (2012), Fostering team creativity. Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential, “Journal of Applied Psychology”, vol. 97 no. 5, pp. 982–996.
Hofstede G. (1984), Culture’s consequences. International differences in work-related values, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
Holton J.A. (2007), The coding process and its challenges, in: The Sage handbook of grounded theory, Bryant A., Charmaz K. (eds.), Sage Publications, London, pp. 265–289.
Hong H.-J. (2010), Bicultural competence and its impact on team effectiveness, “International Journal of Cross Cultural Management”, vol. 10 no. 1, pp. 93–120.
LaFromboise T., Coleman H.L., Gerton J. (1993), Psychological impact of biculturalism. Evidence and theory, “Psychological Bulletin”, vol. 114 no. 3, p. 395.
Larsson R., Lubatkin M. (2001), Achieving acculturation in mergers and acquisitions. An international case survey, “Human Relations”, vol. 54 no. 12, pp. 1573–1607.
Locke K.D. (2001), Grounded theory in management research, Sage Publications, London.
Martin G.C. (2014), The effects of cultural diversity in the workplace, “Journal of Diversity Management (JDM)”, vol. 9 no. 2, pp. 89–92.
McDermott R., O’Dell C. (2001), Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge, “Journal of Knowledge Management”, vol. 5 no. 1, pp.76–85.
Mello A.L., Delise L.A. (2015), Cognitive diversity to team outcomes. The roles of cohesion and conflict management, “Small Group Research”, vol. 46 no. 2, pp. 204–226.
Meyer E. (2014), The culture map. Breaking through the invisible boundaries of global business, Public Affairs, Amsterdam.
Mok A., Morris M.W. (2010), An upside to bicultural identity conflict. Resisting groupthink in cultural ingroups, “Journal of Experimental Social Psychology”, vol. 46 no. 6, pp. 1114–1117.
Nguyen A.M.D., Benet‐Martínez V. (2007), Biculturalism unpacked. Components, measurement, individual differences, and outcomes, “Social and Personality Psychology Compass”, vol. 1 no. 1, pp. 101–114.
Nguyen A.M.D., Benet‐Martínez V. (2013), Biculturalism and adjustment. A meta-analysis, “Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology”, vol. 44 no. 1, pp. 122–159.
Noe R.A., Hollenbeck J.R., Gerhart B., Wright P.M. (2017), Human resource management. Gaining a competitive advantage, McGraw-Hill Education, New York.
Patton M.Q. (2007), Sampling, qualitative (purposive), in: The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology, Ritzer G., Ryan M.J. (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 514–515.
Schwartz S.J., Montgomery M.J., Briones E. (2006), The role of identity in acculturation among immigrant people. Theoretical propositions, empirical questions, and applied recommendations, “Human Development”, vol. 49 no. 1, pp. 1–30.
Søderberg A.-M., Holden N. (2002), Rethinking cross cultural management in a globalizing business world, “International Journal of Cross Cultural Management”, vol. 2 no. 1, pp. 103–121.
Stahl G.K., Maznevski M.L., Voigt A., Jonsen K. (2010), Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams. A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups, “Journal of International Business Studies”, vol. 41 no. 4, pp. 690–709.
Tadmor C.T., Tetlock P.E., Peng K. (2009), Acculturation strategies and integrative complexity: The cognitive implications of biculturalism, “Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology”, vol. 40 no. 1, pp. 105–139.
Van Hear, N., Bakewell, O. and Long, K. (2018), Push-pull plus. Reconsidering the drivers of migration, “Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies”, vol. 44 no. 6, pp. 927–944.
Van Nimwegen N., Van der Erf R. (2010), Europe at the crossroads. Demographic challenges and international migration, “Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies”, vol. 36 no. 9, pp. 1359–1379.
Van Oudenhoven J.P., Ward C., Masgoret A.-M. (2006), Patterns of relations between immigrants and host societies, “International Journal of Intercultural Relations”, vol. 30 no. 6, pp. 637–651.
Yin R.K. (2015), Qualitative research from start to finish, Guilford Publications, New York.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.
