Can Cryptocurrencies be the Future of Money? The Role of Democracy

  • Mehmet KARAN
Keywords: cryptocurrencies, fiat money, democracy

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to evaluate if cryptocurrencies that have robust technology and anonymous features can be the money of the future. In this study, the transition phases of paper money, which started to be used at the beginning of the 17th century, to bank money, then banknotes and fiat money were examined. By pointing out that the fiat money system has developed within the conditions of humanity's search for democracy and freedom. It has been stated that fiat money can only be successful in democratic systems where institutions operate freely, and therefore fiat money is an instrument of democracy. It has been concluded that the authoritarian tendencies, which have started in the world since the 21st century due to nationalism, migration, and climate change, are an important factor in the widespread use of cryptocurrencies. It has been concluded that the spread of cryptocurrencies is directly dependent on the democratic practices of countries and if authoritarianism rises, the use of cryptocurrencies will inevitably be more.

References

Acemoğlu D., Robinson J. (2019), The narrow corridor. States, societies, and the fate of liberty, Penguin Publishers, New York.

Anna I. (2021), Iran uses crypto mining to lessen impact of sanctions, Reuters, May 21, https://www.reuters.com/technology/iran-uses-crypto-mining-lessen-impact-sanctions-study-finds-2021-05-21/ [10.03.2022].

Burgess R.W. (1952), Money as an instrument of democracy, “Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society”, vol. 96 no. 5, pp. 566-572.

Butler A., Dafoe S. (2006), The warriors and bankers, Lewis Masonic, Surrey UK.

Goodman H. (2009), The formation of the Bank of England. A response to changing political and economic climate, 1694, “Penn History Review”, vol. 17 no. 1, https://repository.upenn.edu/phr/vol17/iss1/2 [10.02.2022].

Goossens J. (2021), Challenges and opportunities of blockchain and smart contracts for democracy in the distributed, algorithmic state, in Blockchain and public law. Global challenges in the era of decentralization, Pollicino O., De Gregorio G. (eds.), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp. 76-88.

Harari N.Y. (2019), 21 lessons for the 21st century, Vintage Publications, New York.

Hobbes T. (2010), Leviathan, Martinich A.P., Battiste B. (eds.), Broadview Press, Peterborough.

Jongchul K. (2011), How modern banking originated. The London goldsmith-bankers’ institutionalization of trust, “Business History”, vol. 53 no. 6, pp. 939-959.

Lenzer R. (2011), Thomas Jefferson warned the nation about the power of the banks, “Forbes”, October 11, https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertlenzner/2011/11/06/thomas-jefferson-warned-the-nation-about-the-power-of-the-banks/?sh=7a8af2a62b18 [10.02.2022].

Malfuzi A., Mehr A., Rosen M., Alharthi M., Kurilova A. (2020), Economic viability of bitcoin mining using a renewable-based SOFC power system to supply the electrical power demand, “Energy”, vol. 203(c) art. 117843.

Nakamoto S. (2008), Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2008-October/014810.html [10.02.2022].

Quinn S., Roberds W. (2014), How Amsterdam got fiat money, “Journal of Monetary Economics”, vol. 66 no. C, pp. 1-12.

Van Dillen J.G. (1934), The Bank of Amsterdam, in History of the principal public banks, van Dillen J.G. (ed.), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp. 79-124.

Zade M., Myklebost J., Tzscheutschler P., Wagner U. (2019), Is bitcoin the only problem? A scenario model for the power demand of blockchains, “Frontiers in Energy Research”, vol. 7, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00021/full [10.02.2022].

Zerlan J. (2014, May), Bitcoin as the ultimate democratic tool, Wired, May, https://www.wired.com/insights/2014/04/bitcoin-ultimate-democratic-tool/ [10.02.2022].

Published
2022-03-27
Section
Articles