The limits of economic theories and models
Aim: This article was written out of a felt need to reflect on the relationship between economic theories and models on the one hand and the empirical world as we experience it on the other. The question is in particular whether it is possible for economic models and theories to say anything definitive about the world we live in.
Design/Research methods: The article relies on professional publications, both within the field of economics and outside of it.
Conclusions/findings: There is much reason for humility, economic models and theories have hardly anything definitive to say about the empirical world, and there is a need for a more varied menu of theories and models and for a listening ear for the needs and fears of the population at large. The best we can do is discussing competing and conflicting views in a polite way. However, this requires a Sprachethik that looks more and more like an endangered species.
Originality/value of the article: Recent developments concerning the reach of economic models and theories are related to earlier discussions and a way forward is sketched
Aschheim J., Hsieh Ching-Yao (1969), Macroeconomics. Income and monetary theory, Merrill, Columbus, Ohio.
Boland L.A.(1979), A critique of Friedman’s critics, “Journal of Economic Literature”, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 503-522.
Cohen B.J. (2020), Are IPE journals becoming boring?, “International Studies Quarterly”, vol. 54 no. 3, pp. 887-891.
Dewey J. (1938), Logic. The theory of inquiry, Henry Holt and Company, New York.
Dosi G., Roventini A. (2019), More is different … and complex! The case for agent-based macroeconomics, “Journal of Evolutionary Economics”, vol. 29 no. 1, pp. 1-37.
Frazer W.J., Boland L.A. (1983), An essay on the foundation of Friedman’s methodology, “American Economic Review”, vol. 73 no. 1, pp. 129-144.
Friedman M. (1953), The methodology of positive economics, in: Essays in positive economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago – London, pp. 3-43.
Friedman M., Schwartz A.J. (1963), A monetary history of the United States 1867-1960, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Galbraith J.K. (1962 ), The affluent society, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth – Middlesex.
Galbraith J.K. (1963 ), American capitalism. The concept of countervailing power, revised edition, Harmondsworth, Middlesex.
Goldfarb R.S., Ratner J. (2008), “Theory” and “models”: Terminology through the looking glass, “Econ Journal Watch”, vol. 5 no. 1, pp. 91-108.
Hahn F.H. (1973), On the foundations of monetary theory, in: Essays in modern economics (the proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association of University Teachers of Economics, Aberystwyth 1972), eds. Parkin M., Nobay A.R., Longman, London, pp. 230-242.
Hengstmengel J.W. (2012), Dooyeweerd’s philosophy of economics, “Journal of Markets & Morality”, vol. 15 no. 2, pp. 415-429.
Hoksbergen R.(1994), Postmodernism and institutionalism. Toward a resolution of the debate on relativism, “Journal of Economic Issues”, vol. 28 no. 3, pp. 679-714.
Jones Ch.I., Klenow P.J. (2016), Beyond GDP? Welfare across countries and time, “American Economic Review”, vol. 106 no. 9, pp. 2426-2457.
Keynes J.M. (1936), The general theory of employment, interest and money, Macmillan, London.
Klamer A., McCloskey D. (1989), The rhetoric of disagreement, “Rethinking Marxism”, vol. 2 no. 3, pp. 140-161, www.deirdremccloskey.org [04.12.2020].
Klamer A., Meehan J. (1999), The crowding out of academic economics. The case of NAFTA, in: What do economists know? New economics of knowledge, ed. Garnett Jr R.F., Routledge, London – New York, pp. 65-85.
Klant J.J. (1987), Filosofie van de economische wetenschappen, Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden.
Klant J.J. (1994), The nature of economic thought, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
Komlos J. (2019), Foundations of real-world economics, 2nd ed., Routledge, New York – Abingdon.
Losee J. (2001), A historical introduction to the philosophy of science, 4th. Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mäki U. (1995), Diagnosing McCloskey, “Journal of Economic Literature”, vol. 33 no. 3, pp. 1300-1318.
McCloskey D.N. (1994a), Knowledge and persuasion in economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
McCloskey D.N. (1994b), How economists persuade, “Journal of Economic Methodology”, vol. 1 no. 1, pp. 15-32.
McCloskey D.N. (1995), Modern epistemology against analytic philosophy. A Reply to Mäki, “Journal of Economic Literature”, vol. 33 no. 3, pp. 1319-1323.
McCloskey D. (1999), Jack, David, and Judith looking at me looking at them, in: What do economists know? New economics of knowledge, ed. Garnett Jr R.F., Routledge, London – New York, pp. 60-64.
Morgan M.S., Knuuttila Y.T. (2008), Models and modelling in economics, paper, in: (2012) Handbook of the philosophy of economics, ed. Mäki U., Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1499975 [04.12.2020].
Müller-Kademann Ch. (2018), The Lucas critique. A Lucas critique, “Economic Thought”, vol. 7 no. 2, pp. 54-62.
Park M.-S., Kayatekin S.A (2000), McCloskey, economics as conversation, and Sprachethik, “Cambridge Journal of Economics”, vol. 24 no. 5, pp. 565-580.
Patinkin D. (1969 ), Money, interest, and prices. An integration of monetary and value theory, 2nd. ed., Harper & Row, New York.
Piketty T. (2014), Capital in the twenty-first century, transl. A. Goldhammer, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA – London.
Plato (1968), The Republic, transl. and introduction H.D.P. Lee, Penguin, Harmondworth.
Popper K.R. ( 1976 ), Conjectures and refutations. The growth of scientific knowledge, 4th ed., Routledge and Kegan Paul, London – Henley.
Reinhart C.M., Rogoff K. (2009), This time is different. Eight centuries of financial folly, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Salanti A. (2014), Rigor versus relevance in economic theory. A plea for a different methodological perspective, “History of Political Economy”, vol. 46 no.1, pp. 149-166.
Schumpeter J.A. (1967 ), History of economic analysis, ed. from manuscript by E. Boody Schumpeter, George Allen & Unwin, London.
Simon H.A. (1955), A behavioral model of rational choice, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 69 no. 1, pp. 99-118.
Stiglitz J.E. (2013), The price of inequality, Penguin, London.
Stiglitz J.E. (2019), People, power and profits. Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent, Allen Lane, London.
Stiglitz J.E. (2020), Conquering the great divide, “Finance & Development”, vol. 57 no.3, pp. 17-19.
Suhr M.(2005), John Dewey zur Einführung, Junius Verlag, Hamburg.
Veblen T. (1918 ), The theory of the leisure class, new edition, B.W. Heubsch, New York 1918, https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/veblen-the-theory-of-the-leisure-class-an-economic-study-of-institutions [07.07.2020].
Visser H.(1971), Neutraal geld, een overzicht, “De Economist”, vol. 119 no. 4, pp. 393-439.
Webb J. (1987), Is Friedman’s methodological instrumentalism a special case of Dewey’s instrumental philosophy? A comment on Wible, “Journal of Economic Issues”, vol. 21 no. 1, pp. 393-429.
Wible J.R. (1987), Criticism and the validity of the special-case interpretation of Friedman’s essay. Reply to Webb, “Journal of Economic Issues”, vol. 21 no. 1, pp. 430-440.
Wible J.R., Sedgley II N.H. (1999), The role of econometrics in the neoclassical research program, in: What do economists know? New economics of knowledge, ed. Garnett Jr R.F., Routledge, London – New York, pp. 169-189.
Copyright (c) 2020 WSB University in Wroclaw
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB University in Wrocław, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB University in Wrocław, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB University in Wrocław.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB University in Wrocław.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB University in Wrocław.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.