The World in the Post-Truth Era or How Too Much Love of TINA Will Kill You
Aim: The temptation to provide simple answers to complex problems exists for politicians and scientists alike. This essay attempts to briefly outline the complexity of present day problems at global level, taking as a starting point the question “how quick will the EU collapse?”
Design / Research methods: Brief discussions are given of separate yet interconnected, causally related and overlapping natural and social research domains, illustrating the need for qualified multidisciplinary spokesmen able to separate facts from “alternative facts.”
Conclusions / findings: Making the simple anthropological observation that people can choose policies that are self-destructive does not make social science politicized or value-biased. A society that considers global warming, depletion and pollution caused by fossil fuels as mere externalities makes a demonstrable erratic choice. Because one of the major goals of science is to establish (in)validity of “common sense,” it is duty of academics to tell our students that societies, including entire scientific departments, can make consistent erratic choices.
Originality / value of the article: This essay may help scholars and practitioners to start to look at their research domain in a (much) wider global context.
Brenner, R. (1998). The economics of global turbulence. London: Verso.
Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. London: Penguin.
Feyerabent, P. (1987). Farewell to reason. London: Biddles Ltd.
Graziana, A. (2003). The monetary theory of production. Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, A. H. (1909). The disappearance of the small landowner. Oxford University Press.
Kampen, J. K. (2009). Good governance at the local level: toward a global village or a city republic? Economic and Environmental Studies 9(1): 11-29.
Kampen, J. K., S. van de Walle & G. Bouckaert (2006). Assessing the relation between satisfaction with public service delivery and trust in government. The impact of the predisposition of citizens toward Government on evaluations of its performance, Public Performance & Management Review 29(4): 387-404.
Longerich, P. (2010). Goebbels: A biography. New York: Random House.
McKibben, B. (2007). Deep economy. Economics as if the world mattered. Oxford, UK: Oneworld Publications.
MEA (2005). See Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being. Synthesis. Retreived from the Internet January 3rd, 2017. URL http://www.unep.org/maweb/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf.
Piketti, T. (2013). Le capital au XXIe siècle. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Oreskes, N. & E. M. Conway (2011). Merchants of doubt. How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. London: Bloomsbury Press.
Oxfam, 2005. Richest 1% will own more than all the rest by 2016. Retreived from the Internet 5 January 2017. URL https://www.oxfam.org/en/pressroom/pressreleases/2015-01-19/richest-1-will-own-more-all-rest-2016.
Quay, P.D., B. Tilbrook, C.S. Wong (1992). Oceanic uptake of fossil fuel CO2: carbon-13 evidence, Science 256: 74-79.
Reich, R. B. Supercapitalism. The transformation of business, democracy, and everyday life. New York: Random House.
Roberts, P. (2004). The end of oil. The decline of the petroleum economy and the rise of a new energy order. London: Bloomsbury.
Stiglitz, J. (2006). Making globalization work. London: Pinguin.
Strahan, D. (2007). The last oil shock. A survival guide to the imminent extinction Petroleum Man. London: John Murray.
Stuiver, M., Burk, R. L. and Quay, P. D. (1984). 13C/12C ratios and the transfer of biospheric carbon to the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res. 89(11) 731-748.
Swanborn, P. (1996). A common base for quality control criteria in quantitative and qualitative research, Quality and Quantity 30(1): 19-35.
Ward, P. D. & D. Brownlee (2004). Rare Earth. Why complex life is uncommon in the universe. New York: Copernicus Books.
Weimer, D.L.; Vining, A.R. (1989). Policy Analysis: concepts and practice. London: Prentice-Hall.
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB University in Wrocław, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB University in Wrocław, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB University in Wrocław.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB University in Wrocław.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB University in Wrocław.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.