Sokrates Forms
a research instrument for creating social impact of science on the example of system risk management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.1027Keywords:
data collection, social impact of science, system risk, Pareto Principle, functional stupidity, black swansAbstract
Abstract:
Aim: This paper introduces Sokrates Forms, an innovative survey instrument with advanced functionalities that enhance data accuracy, respondent engagement, and compliance with data protection regulations. The primary objective is to develop and implement a dynamic, secure, and customizable survey tool that supports both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies while offering a feedback mechanism to participants.
Design / Research methods: The study presents the architecture, methodology, and implementation of Sokrates Forms, highlighting its modular and scalable design. The tool integrates adaptive survey paths, rigorous data validation protocols, and a personalized feedback system, which not only improves response quality but also fosters user engagement. Anonymization features ensure compliance with data protection standards, allowing surveys to be conducted either anonymously or through login-based participation for repeated studies. A case study on assessing organizational vulnerabilities in the context of system risk management demonstrates the tool’s application in real-world research scenarios.
JEL: C81, D63, D81, D84
References
Alvesson, M., Spicer, A.: A stupidity-based theory or organizations. J. Manage. Stud. 49(7),
–1220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.467-6486.2012.01072.x
M. S. Allen, D. Iliescu, and S. Greiff, “Single Item Measures in Psychological Science: A Call to Action,” European Journal of Psychological Assessment, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–5, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000699.
Audette, L.M., Hammond, M.S. and Rochester, N.K., 2020. Methodological issues with coding participants in anonymous psychological longitudinal studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(1), pp.163-185.
Elston, D.M., 2021. Participation bias, self-selection bias, and response bias. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Groves, R.M., 2006. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), pp.646-675.
Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Books, London (2011)
Khankeh, H.R., Hosseini, S.H., Farrokhi, M., Hosseini, M.A. and Amanat, N., 2019. Early warning system models and components in emergency and disaster: a systematic literature review protocol. Systematic reviews, 8, pp.1-4.
Kunz, T. and Gummer, T., 2024. Effects of objective and perceived burden on response quality in web surveys. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, pp.1-11.
Ochoa, C. and Revilla, M., 2023. Willingness to participate in in-the-moment surveys triggered by online behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, 55(3), pp.1275-1291.
Platje, J. (2019), The capacity of companies to create an early warning system for unexpected
events – an explorative study. In: Nguyen, N.T., Kowalczyk, R.,Mercik, J.,Motylska-Ku´zma,
A. (eds.) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXXIV. LNCS, vol. 11890,
pp. 47–62. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60555-4_4
Robbins, D., 1999. Questionnaire construction. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC POLICY, 71, pp.87-98.
Taleb, N.N.: The Black Swan - The Impact of theHighly Improbable. Penguin Books, London
(2007)
Taleb, N.N.: Antifragile - Things that Gain from Disorder. Penguin Books, London (2012)
Voight, P., von dem Bussche, A. (2024), The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
A Practical Guide, second edition, Springer Nature, Switzerland.
Wucker, M. (2016). The gray rhino: How to recognize and act on the obvious dangers we ignore. Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 WSB Merito University in Wroclaw
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.
