Consumer Barriers to the Circular Economy
a managerial perspective on the "value-action gap"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.1042Keywords:
Sustainable Consumption, Green Marketing, Value-Action Gap, Consumer Behavior, Circular EconomyAbstract
Aim: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the “Value-Action Gap” in the context of the Circular Economy (CE). While European consumers increasingly express concern for environmental sustainability, their purchasing behavior often remains linear. The aim is to identify the specific structural and behavioral barriers that prevent consumers from adopting circular behaviors and to propose managerial strategies to overcome them.
Design / Research methods: This article employs a conceptual review methodology, synthesizing literature from behavioral economics, consumer psychology, and green marketing. It applies the “Attitude-Behavior Gap” theoretical framework to the specific context of circular business models.
Conclusions / findings: The analysis reveals that the primary obstacles to circular consumption are not educational, but structural. Consumers face a “trust deficit” regarding used goods, economic disincentives due to the low cost of new linear products, and cognitive fatigue associated with behavioral change.
Originality / value of the article: This paper shifts the focus from “educating the consumer” to “redesigning the value proposition.” It provides a novel framework for managers to use Product-as-a-Service (PaaS) and behavioral nudges to align circular behaviors with consumer convenience.
Implications: Managers must stop relying on “green guilt” marketing and instead compete on convenience and risk reduction. Policymakers must support standardization in secondary markets to build trust.
JEL: M31, Q56, D12.
References
Akerlof G.A. (1970), The market for “lemons”. Quality, uncertainty and the market mechanism “The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 84 no. 3, pp. 488–500.
Carrington M.J., Neville B.A., Whitwell G.J. (2010), Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk. Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers, “Journal of Business Ethics”, vol. 97 no. 1, pp. 139–158.
Choudhary K., Sangwan K.S., Goyal D. (2022), “Environment, Development and Sustainability”, vol. 21 no. 1, pp. 1–24.
Echegaray F., Hansstein F.V. (2017), Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: the case of Brazil, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 142, pp. 180–190.
European Commission (2020), A new Circular Economy Action Plan: for a cleaner and more competitive Europe, European Commission, Brussels.
Gleim M.R., Smith J.S., Andrews D., Cronin Jr J.J. (2013), Against the green: a multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption, “Journal of Retailing”, vol. 89 no. 1, pp. 44–61.
Groening C., Sarkis J., Zhu Q. (2018), Green marketing consumer-level theory review. A compendium of applied theories and further research directions, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 172, pp. 1848–1866.
IKEA (2023), Sustainability report FY23, Inter IKEA Systems B.V., Delft.
Loop (2023), Impact report: the economics of reuse, Loop Global.
Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. (2008), Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Thaler R.H., Sunstein C.R. (2021), Nudge: the final edition, Penguin Books, New York.
Tukker A. (2004), Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet, “Business Strategy and the Environment”, vol. 13 no. 4, pp. 246–260.
Tuni A. et al. (2023), Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, 135722.
Tunn V.S.C., Bocken N.M.P., van den Hende E.A., Schoormans J.P.L. (2019), Business models for sustainable consumption in the circular economy: an expert study, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 212, pp. 324–333.
White K., Habib R., Hardisty D.J. (2019), How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework, “Journal of Marketing”, vol. 83 no. 3, pp. 22–49.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2026-03-31 (2)
- 2026-03-28 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 WSB Merito University in Wroclaw
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.
