The Impact of Online Trading on Stock Market Efficiency
what have we learned from the Gamestop case?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29015/cerem.1038Keywords:
Online trading, Stock market efficiency, GameStop case, Social mediaAbstract
Aim: To examine the impact of online trading and technological innovations on stock market efficiency, with a focus on the GameStop case as an illustrative example.
Research methods: Conceptual and qualitative analysis drawing on the GameStop event, regulatory comparisons between the US and Europe, and a review of literature on electronic trading platforms, financial information dissemination, and social media–driven investor coordination.
Findings: Online trading platforms, Web 2.0, and social media have transformed investor behaviour and market dynamics. The GameStop case revealed how coordinated retail investors can challenge traditional market mechanisms and the efficient market hypothesis. The “gamification” of trading apps encourages speculative behaviour and raises concerns about investor risk awareness. Regulatory approaches to short selling differ between the US and Europe, highlighting the need for balanced, internationally coordinated frameworks. Strengthened financial education and updated regulation are essential to mitigate risks while retaining the benefits of technological advances.
JEL: G14, G18, G23, O33
References
Allen F., Haas M., Nowak E., Pirovano M., Tengulov A. (2021), Squeezing Shorts Through Social Media Platforms, Swiss Finance Institute, 10 April.
Ardia D., Aymard C., Cenesizoglu T. (2022), Examining High-Frequency Patterns in Robinhood Users’ Trading Behavior, 6 February, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4028045, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4028045.
Armour J., Eidenmüller H. (2020), Brexit and Financial Regulation, “European Business Organization Law Review”, vol. 21, pp. 55–82.
Avgouleas E. (2012), Governance of Global Financial Markets. The Law, the Economics, the Politics, Cambridge University Press, London, pp. 324–326.
Beber A., Pagano M. (2013), Short-Selling Bans Around the World. Evidence from the 2007–09 Crisis, “Journal of Finance”, vol. 68 no. 1, pp. 343–381.
Benabou R., Laroque G. (1992), Using Privileged Information to Manipulate Markets. Insiders, Gurus, and Credibility, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 107 no. 3, pp. 921–958.
Betzer A., Harries J.P. (2021), How Online Comments Affect Stock Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3844378 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3844378.
Bock J., Geissel S. (2024), Evolution of Stock Market Efficiency in Europe. Evidence from Measuring Periods of Inefficiency, “Finance Research Letters”, vol. 62 part A, 105129.
Cipriano M., Gruca T. (2014), The Power of Priors. How Confirmation Bias Impacts Market Prices, “The Journal of Prediction Markets”, vol 8 no 3, https://doi.org/10.5750/jpm.v8i3.974.
Degutis A., Novickytè L. (2014), The Efficient Market Hypothesis. A Critical Review of Literature and Methodology, “Ekonomika”, vol. 93 no. 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Ekon.2014.2.3549.
DeMarzo P.M., Vayanos D., Zwiebel J. (2003), Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Unidimensional Opinions, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 118 no. 3.
Eaton G.W., Green T.C., Roseman B.S., Wu Y. (2021), Zero-Commission Individual Investors, High Frequency Traders, and Stock Market Quality, https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~jhasbrou/SternMicroMtg/Old/SternMicroMtg2021/Papers/Zero-commission%20individual%20traders.pdf.
Eaton G.W., Green T.C., Roseman B.S., Wu Y. (2022), Retail Trader Sophistication and Stock Market Quality. Evidence from Brokerage Outages, “Journal of Financial Economics”, vol. 146, 2022, pp. 502–528, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3776874 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3776874.
ESMA (2020), Decision of 16 March 2020 on Short Selling Restrictions, ESMA70-155-9546.
ESMA (2022), Final Report: Review of the Short Selling Regulation, ESMA70-156-4978, March.
European Commission (2010), Proposal for a Regulation on Short Selling and Certain Aspects of Credit Default Swaps, COM (2010) 482 final, 15 September.
European Commission (2022), Targeted Consultation on the Review of the Short Selling Regulation (SSR), https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Regulatory/Secondary-markets/CSDR-Settlement-Regulation/ICMACSDR-Review-Targeted-ConsultationFeb-21Detailed-response-020221.pdf.
Fama E.F. (1970), Efficient Capital Markets. A Review of Theory and Empirical Work, “Journal of Finance”, vol. 25 no. 2, May.
Financial Conduct Authority (2021), Short Selling Regulation (SSR). Notification and Disclosure of Net Short Positions, UK SSR.
Fisch J.E. (2022), GameStop and the Reemergence of the Retail Investor, U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 22-16, Boston University Law Review, forthcoming, European Corporate Governance Institute - Law Working Paper No. 637/2022, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4049896.
Guan S. (2023), The Rise of the Finfluencer, 19 New York University Journal of Law and Business 489 (2023), Santa Clara Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 4400042, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4400042 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4400042.
Haghani V., Ragulin V., Dewey R. (2022), Night Moves. Is the Overnight Drift the Grandmother of All Market Anomalies, June 17, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4139328 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4139328.
Jackson, Jr. R.J., Mitts J. (2023), Trading on Terror?, December 6, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4652027 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4652027.
Long S.C., Lucey B.M., Yarovaya L., Xie Y. (2022), “I Just Like the Stock”. The Role of Reddit Sentiment in the GameStop Share Rally, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3822315 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3822315.
Moloney N. (2011), The European Securities and Markets Authority and Institutional Design for the EU Financial Market—A Tale of Two Competences. Part (1) Rule-making, “European Business Organization Law Review”, vol. 12 no. 1, pp. 41–86.
Moloney N. (2014), EU Securities and Financial Markets Regulation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1004–1012.
Oedzes J.J., Van der Vegt G.S., Rink F.A., Walter F. (2019), On the Origins of Informal Hierarchy. The Interactive Role of Formal Leadership and Task Complexity, “Journal of Organizational Behavior”, vol. 40 no. 3, pp. 311–324.
Omarova S.T. (2021), The People’s Ledger. How to Democratize Money and Finance the Economy, “Vanderbilt Law Review”, no. 1231, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3715735 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3715735
Raddant M., Kenett D.Y. (2020), Interconnectedness in the Global Financial Market, “Journal of International Money and Finance”, vol. 110 no. 3, 102280.
Singer P., Flöck F., Meinhart C., Zeitfogel E., Strohmaier (2014), Evolution of Reddit. From the Front Page of the Internet to a Self-referential Community?, “Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web 2014”, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2576943.
Stiebel J.H. (2022), GameStop: Power to the Players?, “Journal of Insurance and Financial Management”, vol. 6 no. 4, pp. 95–116, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3883295 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3883295.
Tirole J. (1985), Asset Bubbles and Overlapping Generations, “Econometrica”, vol. 53 no. 6, pp. 1499–1528.
van der Beck P., Coralie J. (2021), The Equity Market Implications of the Retail Investment Boom, “Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper”, no. 21-12, 30 January, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3776421 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3776421.
Vasileiou E., Bartzou E., Tzanakis P. (2021), Explaining Gamestop Short Squeeze Using Ιntraday Data and Google Searches, “Journal of Prediction Markets”, 16 March, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3805630 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3805630.
Zaghini A. (2016), Short-selling Bans and Bank Stability. Evidence from the European Sovereign Debt Crisis, “Journal of Financial Stability”, vol. 26, pp. 107–118.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 WSB Merito University in Wroclaw
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The aim of CEREM is to make scientific work available in accordance with the principle of open access. The rules mentioned below are important, as they enable CEREM and its publisher, the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, to distribute the scientific work to a wide public while complying with specific legal requirements, at the same time protecting the rights of the authors.
The author transfers to the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw, free of charge and without territorial limitations, with all proprietary copyrights to the said piece of work in the understanding of the act of 4th February 1994 on copyrights and derivative rights (Journal of Laws of 1994, no. 24, item 83, as amended) on an exclusivity basis, i.e. the rights to:
1. Make the piece of work in question available via the Digital Library established by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
2. Produce, record and reproduce in multiple copies the piece of work using any techniques whatsoever, including printing, reprography, magnetic recording and digital processing, and particularly its reproduction by recording on CDs and similar data carriers,
3. Use fragments of the piece of work for promotional purposes in publications, promotional materials, the Internet and Intranet type networks managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
4. Store the piece of work into computer databases managed by the WSB Merito University in Wroclaw.
5. Copy and reproduce the piece of work using photo-mechanic technologies other than those commonly known at the time of the signature hereof (photocopies, Xerox copies etc.),
6. Process the piece of work, transferring it into an electronic form, and distribute it on the Internet without limitations.
